What is the Difference between Negligence and Intentional Torts?

The difference between negligence and intentional torts is very important to understand when it comes to accident law in North Carolina. Negligence is an unintentional tort, meaning the person did not intend to cause harm or loss to another person. Examples of negligence in accident law include not adhering to traffic laws, not taking reasonable safety precautions, or a product malfunctioning. Intentional torts, on the other hand, involve intentional acts by which someone intended to harm another person or cause them financial loss. Examples of intentional torts include battery, assault, and trespass. In accident law, an intentional tort may involve a person’s intention to cause an automobile accident. In North Carolina, negligence is the basis of most accident claims as it is easier to prove than intentional torts. Negligence claims involve the party who caused the accident to prove that they tried to take necessary steps to prevent the accident from occurring. Intentional torts are more difficult to prove because they require that the person intended to cause harm to the other person or cause them financial loss.

Related FAQs

What should I look for when selecting a personal injury lawyer?
How can I prove the other party's negligence in a personal injury claim?
What is liability insurance?
What is an insurance adjuster?
What rights do I have if I am injured in an accident?
What is the role of a personal injury lawyer?
What should I do if I am offered a settlement?
What is a toxic tort?
What is a statute of limitations?
How long do I have to file a lawsuit over an accident?

What is the Difference between Negligence and Intentional Torts?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts