What are the differences between a trial and an arbitration?

When someone is involved in an accident in Delaware and believes they are entitled to legal compensation, they will often need to file a claim. Depending on the circumstances of the case, the claimant can choose either a trial or an arbitration. A trial is conducted in a court of law and presided over by a judge. The two parties present their arguments and evidence to the judge, such as witness testimony or medical records. The judge then makes a ruling based on the presented evidence. Trials are often more expensive, can take longer to resolve, and can have more formal rules and procedures. Arbitration is a form of alternative dispute resolution. It is less formal than a trial and generally involves both parties presenting their case to an arbitrator. The arbitrator will make a ruling on the case which is legally binding. This can be a quicker and less expensive way to resolve a claim compared to a trial, however, it may not provide the same level of protection as a court does. Both trial and arbitration can be beneficial in certain cases. It is important for someone with a claim to talk to a lawyer about their individual case and discuss the best course of action to reach a fair resolution.

Related FAQs

How does the insurance company determine fault in an accident?
What is the difference between a settlement and a verdict?
What is a medical lien?
How can I prove the other party's negligence in a personal injury claim?
What is the legal definition of negligence?
What is a negligence per se claim?
How much does it cost to hire a personal injury lawyer?
What is an affidavit of merit?
What do I need to do to file a personal injury claim?
Can I sue if the accident was caused by a defective product?

What are the differences between a trial and an arbitration?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts