What are the differences between a trial and an arbitration?

A trial and an arbitration are two legal processes that can be used to settle an accident case in North Carolina. The main difference between the two is the method of dispute resolution they each use. In a trial, both parties present their case in front of a jury or judge. During the trial, both parties are allowed to present evidence, question witnesses, and make arguments in order to prove their point. The jury or judge then makes a ruling based on the evidence presented. On the other hand, an arbitration is an alternative dispute resolution process. This process is much less formal than a trial, and the main goal is to reach a mutual agreement between both parties. An arbitrator helps both parties come to an agreement by hearing their arguments and listening to the evidence presented. Unlike a judge, an arbitrator works to settle the dispute between both parties, rather than making a ruling. Overall, a trial and an arbitration are two different processes used to settle an accident case in North Carolina. In a trial, a jury or judge makes a ruling based on the evidence presented, while in an arbitration, an arbitrator helps both parties come to a mutual agreement.

Related FAQs

What should I do if I am offered a settlement?
Can I still make a claim if I was partially at fault for an accident?
What is tort reform?
What is the standard of proof in a personal injury case?
What should I look for when selecting a personal injury lawyer?
What if the other party doesn’t have enough insurance?
How long do I have to file a lawsuit over an accident?
Can I sue a government agency for an accident?
What is a No-Fault Accident?
What is an insurance adjuster?

What are the differences between a trial and an arbitration?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts