What is the standard of proof in a personal injury case?

In California, the standard of proof in a personal injury case is known as a preponderance of the evidence. This means that the plaintiff (the person who is suing) must prove that the defendant (the person being sued) is more likely than not responsible for the injury. This is a lower standard than the ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ standard required in criminal cases. The burden of proof required in a civil lawsuit is lower because the consequences for the defendant are less severe. In a criminal case, a guilty verdict can result in jail time and therefore the standard of proof must be higher. In a personal injury case, the plaintiff is usually seeking monetary compensation and so a lower standard is appropriate. The preponderance of the evidence standard is used when the court must decide between two conflicting versions of the facts. The court must consider which version is more credible, the evidence in support of each side, and the witnesses’ credibility and testimony. The plaintiff must then offer enough proof that their version of the facts is more likely than not correct. It is not necessary for the plaintiff to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt. If the plaintiff can prove their case by a preponderance of the evidence, then the defendant may be liable for the plaintiff’s damages.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between compensation and damages in an accident claim?
What are the key elements of a negligence claim?
What should I do if I have been injured on someone else’s property?
How can I prove the other party's negligence in a personal injury claim?
What are the differences between a trial and an arbitration?
What is a statute of repose?
Can I sue a government agency for an accident?
What is the discovery period in a personal injury case?
What is a wrongful death claim?
What is tort reform?

What is the standard of proof in a personal injury case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts