What is the difference between arbitration and mediation?

Arbitration and mediation are both forms of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) law in Arizona. They are both used to resolve conflicts between two or more parties without going to trial in court. The primary difference between arbitration and mediation is the involvement of a third-party in the resolution process. In arbitration, an arbitrator is appointed to make decisions about the dispute and to settle it. The decision made in an arbitration is legally binding and legally enforceable. The arbitrator will listen to both sides of the dispute and make a decision based on the evidence presented. On the other hand, mediation does not involve a third-party decision-maker. The mediator instead acts as a neutral party to facilitate a resolution between the two parties to the conflict. The resolution reached is not legally binding and the mediator does not make decisions for the parties involved. Rather, the mediation process allows the parties to reach a compromise and to come to an agreement on their own. Both arbitration and mediation can be effective methods of settling disputes in Arizona. Depending on the situation, one may be more suitable than the other. It is important to understand the differences between the two before making a decision as to which route to take.

Related FAQs

What is the timeline for a collaborative law process?
What is the role of the attorneys in an alternative dispute resolution process?
What types of disputes can be addressed through mediation?
What types of cases are not suitable for arbitration?
Can discovery be conducted in a collaborative law process?
What is the role of the parties in an alternative dispute resolution process?
What is a private judging system?
What happens if a party fails to comply with an arbitration award?
What is the role of the court in a mediation process?
What are the benefits of using mediation?

What is the difference between arbitration and mediation?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts