What is the process for selecting an arbitrator?

When selecting an arbitrator for an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) matter in California, parties must first consider the qualifications and experience of the potential arbitrators. An experienced arbitrator will have an in-depth understanding of the law, the relevant facts, and the ability to research and analyze the case in an impartial manner. Parties must also consider the cost of the arbitrator’s services. While some may be willing to take cases on a pro bono basis, they must also consider the time and cost associated with the arbitrator’s services. Parties must also consider the neutrality and impartiality of the arbitrator. If a potential arbitrator has a conflict of interest, or has a relationship with one of the parties, the parties must consider either selecting a different arbitrator or waiving any such conflict. Finally, parties must consider the availability of the arbitrator. The parties should ensure that the arbitrator has the time to dedicate to the case and will be available to consider arguments, review evidence, and render rulings in a timely fashion. Having made these considerations, parties are then in a position to make an informed decision about the selection of an arbitrator for their ADR dispute.

Related FAQs

What should a party expect from an alternative dispute resolution hearing?
What are the ethical considerations for attorneys in a collaborative law process?
What is collaborative law?
What is the role of the attorneys in a mediation process?
How do international arbitration awards differ from domestic arbitration awards?
What types of disputes can be addressed through alternative dispute resolution?
Can discovery be conducted in a collaborative law process?
What happens if an agreement is not reached at a mediation hearing?
Who can use alternative dispute resolution?
What is the role of the experts in an alternative dispute resolution process?

What is the process for selecting an arbitrator?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts