What is the difference between trial and appellate courts?

The difference between trial and appellate courts in Pennsylvania lies in the purpose of each court and the type of proceedings that take place. Trial courts are responsible for the resolution of disputes over specific matters and are the primary forum for litigation. Trial courts in Pennsylvania are known as the Court of Common Pleas. This court has general jurisdiction to hear a variety of civil and criminal cases, including personal injury, domestic relations, real estate, and criminal matters. In contrast, appellate courts are responsible for reviewing decisions made by trial courts. The main purpose of an appellate court is to review a lower court’s decision and determine if there was an error made in the ruling. If an error was made, the appellate court can either affirm or reverse the decision made by the trial court. Applied courts in Pennsylvania include the Superior Court, Commonwealth Court, and Supreme Court. Unlike trial courts, appellate courts do not hold trials or receive evidence. Instead, the appellate court examines the legal arguments presented by the parties to determine if the ruling from the lower court was correct. This often means reviewing the transcripts and briefs prepared by each side and deciding if the court made an error. Overall, trial and appellate courts differ in the types of proceedings conducted and the purpose of each court. While trial courts are responsible for hearing cases and determining outcomes, appellate courts focus on reviewing decisions from lower courts to ensure accuracy and correct errors.

What is the difference between trial and appellate courts?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts