What is the difference between a petition for rehearing and a petition for certiorari?

The major difference between a petition for rehearing and a petition for certiorari is the purpose for which each type of petition is used. A petition for rehearing is used when a party believes an appellate court has misunderstood or misapplied the law in a decision. A party may file a petition for rehearing asking the court to reconsider its decision in light of the law. The court is not obligated to grant the petition. A petition for certiorari is used when a party wants the Washington Supreme Court to review a decision made by a lower court. It is a request to the Supreme Court to review an appellate court’s decision to ensure that the law was properly applied and that the court’s decision was correct. A petitioner must show that the lower court decision is questionable and could have a negative effect on a broader legal principle. The Supreme Court is not obligated to grant a petition for certiorari either.

Related FAQs

What is the appellate court’s scope of review for a trial court’s decision to grant or deny a motion to suppress evidence?
How do I obtain a copy of the appellate court’s opinion?
How do I find a lawyer experienced in appellate law?
What is the purpose of an appellate brief?
What is the difference between a civil and criminal appeal?
What kind of relief can be sought from an appellate court?
What is the procedure for filing a petition for writ of certiorari?
What happens if I lose my appeal?
What is the standard of review on a motion for summary judgment?
What issues can be raised on appeal?

What is the difference between a petition for rehearing and a petition for certiorari?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts