What is the standard of review for an appellate court’s decision?

In Mississippi, the standard of review for an appellate court’s decision is de novo review. This means that the court will review the lower court’s decision without giving any deference to the previous court’s ruling. The court will look at the facts and evidence presented to the lower court and then make its own ruling as to the law and facts applicable in the case. In other words, the appellate court will make its own decision, not based on the decision of the lower court but based on the facts and evidence presented. This means that the appellate court does not have to accept the lower court’s decision, and will take an independent look at the facts to decide if the lower court’s ruling is correct. This is an important part of the appeals process, as it provides a more objective review of the legal issues involved.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between a discretionary and a non-discretionary appeal?
What is the difference between a civil and criminal appeal?
What is the difference between a discretionary appeal and a mandamus petition?
What is the role of an amicus curiae in an appellate court?
What is the appellate court's jurisdiction over a given case?
What is the standard of review on a motion to suppress evidence?
What is the standard of review for an appellate court’s decision on an interlocutory order?
How does an appellate court evaluate a trial court’s factual findings?
What is the process for filing a motion for reconsideration of an appellate court’s decision?
What is the purpose of an appellate brief?

What is the standard of review for an appellate court’s decision?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts