What is the difference between an oral argument and a brief on appeal?

Oral arguments and briefs on appeals are both tools used in appellate law in Kansas. Appellate law relates to cases that have been appealed from a lower court. An oral argument is a presentation made by an attorney to a panel of judges who will decide the outcome of a case. The attorney will present the facts of the case and explain the legal arguments and principles that support their client’s position. Oral arguments are usually limited to fifteen minutes. A brief on appeal is a written document containing legal argument, facts, and authorities that support the party’s position and conclusions. The parties involved in the appeal will submit briefs to the panel of judges. The briefs will outline the facts and arguments in the case, and provide legal authorities upon which they rely. The main difference between an oral argument and a brief on appeal is that an oral argument is a timed presentation and briefs on appeals are written documents that can provide more in-depth legal argument and authorities. Both are used to help the panel of judges decide the outcome of a case.

Related FAQs

What is an interlocutory appeal?
What happens if I lose my appeal?
Are parties prohibited from appealing a judge’s decision?
Who determines the merits of an appeal?
How do I appeal a court decision?
What is the doctrine of res judicata and how does it apply to appellate proceedings?
What is the standard of review for an appeal from a final judgment?
What are the consequences of an appellate court’s decision?
What is the process for obtaining a stay of execution pending appeal?
What is the difference between a direct appeal and a writ of habeas corpus?

What is the difference between an oral argument and a brief on appeal?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts