What is the difference between an oral argument and a brief on appeal?

Oral arguments and briefs on appeal are both important steps in appellate law. Oral arguments are when a lawyer representing a party in an appeal presents his or her case in front of a justices’ panel. During an oral argument, the lawyer will present the facts of the case to the justices and explain the legal arguments that support their position. The justices may ask questions or point out errors in the argument during the hearing. A brief on appeal is a written document the lawyer presents to the court. It includes all the facts and legal arguments of the case. It is the main way the court will analyze the case and make a decision. The brief contains the facts and law of the case, as well as citations to the relevant law and precedents. It also contains the lawyer’s arguments on why the court should side with their party. The main difference between an oral argument and a brief on appeal is that the oral argument is an opportunity for the lawyer to present their legal arguments and facts to the justices in person. The justices may ask questions or make comments on the arguments. In contrast, the brief on appeal is a written document that provides the justices with the legal arguments and facts of the case in detail. The justices will use the brief on appeal to make a decision.

Related FAQs

What is the process for obtaining an appellate court’s review of a jury verdict?
Are parties prohibited from appealing a judge’s decision?
What is the appellate court's jurisdiction over a given case?
What are the grounds for appealing a magistrate judge’s decision?
How do I cite to appellate court decisions?
How do I file a motion for reconsideration with an appellate court?
What is an amicus curiae brief?
What are the time limits for filing an appeal?
How do I appeal a court decision?
What types of appellate arguments are available?

What is the difference between an oral argument and a brief on appeal?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts