What is the difference between an oral argument and a brief on appeal?

Oral arguments and briefs on appeals are both tools used in appellate law in Kansas. Appellate law relates to cases that have been appealed from a lower court. An oral argument is a presentation made by an attorney to a panel of judges who will decide the outcome of a case. The attorney will present the facts of the case and explain the legal arguments and principles that support their client’s position. Oral arguments are usually limited to fifteen minutes. A brief on appeal is a written document containing legal argument, facts, and authorities that support the party’s position and conclusions. The parties involved in the appeal will submit briefs to the panel of judges. The briefs will outline the facts and arguments in the case, and provide legal authorities upon which they rely. The main difference between an oral argument and a brief on appeal is that an oral argument is a timed presentation and briefs on appeals are written documents that can provide more in-depth legal argument and authorities. Both are used to help the panel of judges decide the outcome of a case.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between a petition for rehearing and a petition for certiorari?
Are there any deadlines or limitations periods for filing an appeal?
How do I cite to appellate court decisions?
What is an en banc hearing and how does it differ from a typical appellate hearing?
What are the grounds for appealing a judge’s decision?
How does an appellate court evaluate a trial court’s legal errors?
What remedies are available for a party who loses an appeal?
How do I find a lawyer experienced in appellate law?
What is the standard of proof necessary to win an appeal?
What is the appellate court's jurisdiction over a given case?

What is the difference between an oral argument and a brief on appeal?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts