What is the standard of review on a motion for summary judgment?

The standard of review on a motion for summary judgment in Michigan is de novo. This means that the reviewing court will independently review all the evidence presented and make its own determination on the matter. In Michigan, a motion for summary judgment occurs when a party to a case believes there is no reasonable dispute that the facts support their position and that a judgment should be granted in their favor. The reviewing court first examines whether the party seeking summary judgment has demonstrated conclusively their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. If this is satisfied, then the court will look at the facts and examine whether there is a genuine dispute of material fact. Ultimately, the court must determine whether, regardless of the facts, the party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. In Michigan, the court is not bound by the findings of the lower court. It will independently review the facts and make its own determination on the merits of the motion. This is known as de novo review. If the court finds the motion has merit, it will grant summary judgment in favor of the party that requested it.

Related FAQs

How do I appeal a criminal conviction?
What is the process for filing a petition for certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court?
How do I protect my rights if I do not have an attorney during an appeal?
What is the process for seeking review by the U.S. Supreme Court?
What is the process for filing a petition for rehearing?
Are there any deadlines or limitations periods for filing an appeal?
What is the process for obtaining an appellate court’s review of a jury verdict?
What happens if I lose my appeal?
Are parties prohibited from appealing a judge’s decision?
What procedures are available to challenge a conviction on appeal?

What is the standard of review on a motion for summary judgment?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts