What is the standard of review on a motion to suppress evidence?

In South Carolina, the standard of review on a motion to suppress evidence is known as de novo review. This means that the court will review the evidence as if no previous legal proceedings had occurred. This means that the court will not give deference to any previous hearings or rulings made by the lower court. The court will consider the evidence itself, rather than deferring to the lower court’s decisions. The court will then decide whether the facts that led to the suppression of evidence were justified. During this de novo review, the court will decide whether the facts presented in the motion to suppress establishes that the evidence was obtained in violation of the accused’s constitutional rights. If the court finds that the facts do not establish such a violation, then the evidence is admissible. At the same time, the court must consider whether the evidence sought to be admitted is relevant to the case. The court must also determine whether the motion to suppress conforms to the legal standards of the state. In general, South Carolina courts will balance the public and private interests of the case. If the court believes that the rights of the accused outweigh the public interest, then the motion to suppress will be granted.

Related FAQs

How do I protect my rights if I do not have an attorney during an appeal?
How can I present my arguments to an appellate court?
What is the process for obtaining an appellate court’s review of a case?
How are cases selected for review by an appellate court?
How do I obtain an appellate court transcript?
What is the role of the appellate court in determining the facts of a case?
How do I appeal a criminal conviction?
What is the appellate court’s role in interpreting statutes?
What is the standard of review on a motion for summary judgment?
What evidence is available to support an appeal?

What is the standard of review on a motion to suppress evidence?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts