What is the appellate court’s scope of review for a trial court’s decision to grant or deny a motion to suppress evidence?

The Nebraska Supreme Court is the highest appellate court in the state of Nebraska when it comes to appellate law. It is the court of last resort in Nebraska, and it handles appeals from all lower courts. When it comes to a trial court’s decision to grant or deny a motion to suppress evidence, the appellate court’s scope of review is limited. The appellate court will usually not disturb the trial court’s decision unless it is determined that the trial court abused its discretion in granting or denying the motion. This means that the appellate court must determine whether it can find any reasonable basis in the record that supports the trial court’s decision. If the appellate court finds that the trial court acted reasonably in granting or denying the motion to suppress, then the trial court’s decision will be upheld. If, however, the appellate court determines that the trial court acted unreasonably, then it may overturn the decision and grant or deny the motion to suppress evidence.

Related FAQs

What is the process for obtaining a stay of execution pending an appeal?
What are the time limits for filing an appeal?
What is the difference between a civil and criminal appeal?
What is the process for obtaining a stay of execution pending an appeal?
What is the process for filing a petition for certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court?
How are cases selected for review by an appellate court?
What is the difference between a direct appeal and a writ of habeas corpus?
What is a writ of certiorari and how is it used in appellate practice?
What is the process for obtaining an appellate court’s review of a case?
What is the standard of review on a trial court’s decision to admit or exclude evidence?

What is the appellate court’s scope of review for a trial court’s decision to grant or deny a motion to suppress evidence?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts