What is the standard of review for an appeal from a final judgment?

The standard of review for an appeal from a final judgment in New Hampshire is referred to as Thayer Standard of Review. This standard is used when determining the amount of deference that should be given to the trial court’s findings. The Thayer Standard of Review states that the court must review the case with a special caution and should not reverse the trial court’s decision unless it is clearly wrong. The Thayer Standard of Review was developed by Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in the case of Thayer vs. Boston & Maine Railroad Co. In this case, Justice Holmes determined that the court should pay special attention to the findings of the trial court and should only reverse it when it is clear that the decision was wrong. The court must be able to show that the trial court’s findings were unreasonable, based on the facts presented. The Thayer Standard of Review is often used in appeals from final judgments in New Hampshire. It requires the appellate court to give deference to the findings of the trial court and must only reverse if it determines that the decision was clearly wrong. This helps to ensure that the final judgment is fair and accurate.

Related FAQs

Are there any deadlines or limitations periods for filing an appeal?
What remedies are available for a party who loses an appeal?
What is the procedure for requesting an en banc hearing?
What is the process for filing an appellate brief?
What is the process for seeking an en banc hearing on an appeal?
What is an en banc hearing and how does it differ from a typical appellate hearing?
How should I prepare for oral argument on an appeal?
How do I protect my rights if I do not have an attorney during an appeal?
What is the procedure for filing a petition for rehearing en banc?
Who determines the merits of an appeal?

What is the standard of review for an appeal from a final judgment?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts