What is the standard of review for an appellate court’s decision on an interlocutory order?

An interlocutory order is an interim judgment from a lower court, usually one that is not final or appealable. In Florida, an appellate court must review an interlocutory order to determine if it was proper or not. The standard of review for an appellate court’s decision on an interlocutory order is de novo, meaning the appellate court will look at the case without deference to the lower court’s findings. The appellate court will examine the evidence and arguments presented by both sides and come to its own conclusion on the legal issues. The appellate court will then make its own ruling on the issue. Generally, the appellate court will then grant the party with the prevailing argument the relief that they sought. The appellate court may also modify the lower court’s order as necessary to properly address the issue. It is important to remember that when it comes to interlocutory orders, the appellate court’s decision is not necessarily final and may be subject to further appeal.

Related FAQs

What are the time limits for filing an appeal?
What is the appellate court’s jurisdiction over a case?
What is the difference between a discretionary and a non-discretionary appeal?
What is an appellate court’s ruling on a motion to dismiss?
What is the process for seeking an en banc hearing on an appeal?
What is the difference between an appeal and a writ of certiorari?
What happens if I lose my appeal?
What is the process for filing a motion for reconsideration of an appellate court’s decision?
What is a writ of certiorari and how is it used in appellate practice?
What is the standard of review for an appellate court’s interpretation of a statute?

What is the standard of review for an appellate court’s decision on an interlocutory order?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts