Are there any grounds for setting aside an arbitration award?

Yes, there are certain grounds for setting aside an arbitration award in Washington. An arbitration award can be set aside when there has been a departure from the essential requirements of law, when the award has been procured by fraud or corruption, or when the decision is contrary to public policy. In Washington, the party seeking to set aside the award may bring a motion or petition before the court. The court will review the award and determine whether there has been any legal or public policy violation, and if so, the motion or petition may be granted. If the motion or petition is granted, the court may order a modification of the award, or it may be set aside and a new proceeding is ordered. The party challenging the award has the burden of proof and must convince the court that the award should be set aside. If the court determines that the award should not be set aside, then the award remains in effect and will be enforced by the court. Thus, there are certain grounds on which an arbitration award in Washington can be set aside, and such a motion or petition must be brought before a court in order to have the award reviewed. The party seeking to set aside the award must demonstrate that there has been a violation of law or public policy, and if so, the motion or petition may be granted.

Related FAQs

What is a motion to vacate, modify or correct an arbitration award?
How do I challenge the jurisdiction of an arbitrator?
What is the difference between the Federal Arbitration Act and state arbitration law?
Are there any special considerations for consumer arbitration?
Can I challenge an arbitrator’s decision?
Are there any limitations on the remedies that can be awarded in an arbitration?
What is a class action arbitration?
Are there any special considerations for commercial arbitration?
What is a mini-trial?
What is an arbitration award?

Are there any grounds for setting aside an arbitration award?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts