What is the difference between a motion to compel arbitration and a motion to stay proceedings pending arbitration?

A motion to compel arbitration and a motion to stay proceedings pending arbitration are two different motions made in the context of arbitration law in Kansas. A motion to compel arbitration is a legal request to the court, asking it to order the parties involved in a dispute to submit to arbitration. This motion may be made when one party has initiated legal proceedings without first going to arbitration. A motion to stay proceedings pending arbitration is a legal request to the court, asking it to put legal proceedings on hold until arbitration has been completed. This motion may be made when one party has initiated legal proceedings and then requested that the dispute be settled by arbitration. In both cases, the requesting party must provide sufficient evidence to the court to demonstrate that arbitration is the appropriate way to settle the dispute. Additionally, both motions must meet the requirements of Kansas arbitration law, which states that the court must be satisfied that the arbitration agreement is valid and that the parties have consented to arbitration. If the court is satisfied, it will grant the motion and order the parties to proceed with arbitration.

Related FAQs

What is an offer of judgment?
What is a motion to compel arbitration or stay proceedings?
What is a motion to limit the scope of an arbitration?
How much does an arbitration process usually cost?
What is an agreement to arbitrate?
What is a motion to confirm an arbitration award?
How to I challenge an arbitrator’s decision?
How do I submit evidence in an arbitration hearing?
What is the effect of arbitral immunity?
What is a multi-party arbitration?

What is the difference between a motion to compel arbitration and a motion to stay proceedings pending arbitration?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts