What is the difference between a motion in limine and a motion to suppress evidence in business litigation?

Business litigation is a broad term that can refer to any type of legal dispute between two or more parties, usually related to money or business interests. Minnesota is a state that follows the general rules of civil litigation. When it comes to the topic of motions in business litigation, two specific motions stand out: motions in limine and motions to suppress evidence. A motion in limine is a type of motion that is typically made when a party does not want certain evidence to be presented during trial. For example, if a witness was going to be called to testify and the other party wanted to prevent the witness from testifying, they would use a motion in limine. The motion would argue that certain evidence should not be heard and should be excluded from the proceedings. A motion to suppress evidence is another type of motion that can be used in business litigation. This motion asks the court to exclude evidence that has been obtained in violation of the defendant’s Constitutional rights. This type of motion is usually filed when the defense believes that the evidence has been obtained illegally. The motion requests that the evidence be thrown out and not used at trial. The main difference between a motion in limine and a motion to suppress evidence in business litigation is that a motion in limine is used to exclude certain evidence that may be beneficial to the opposition, while a motion to suppress evidence is used to exclude evidence that has been illegally obtained. Both motions can be used to limit the evidence that is presented in a trial and can have a major impact on the outcome of a case.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between a motion in limine and a motion to suppress evidence in business litigation?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts