What is the difference between a motion in limine and a motion to suppress evidence in business litigation?

Business Litigation Law is the area of law that deals with disputes between businesses, such as contract disputes or intellectual property disputes. In Mississippi, lawyers will often use a motion in limine or a motion to suppress evidence to help their clients win these disputes. A motion in limine is a motion that lawyers file before trial to ask the judge to bar a certain piece of evidence from being used in the trial, or to keep certain topics from being discussed. This motion is most often used to keep inflammatory or prejudicial evidence from tainting the trial and swaying the jury’s opinion. A motion to suppress evidence is a motion that lawyers file to stop certain pieces of evidence from being used in the trial. This motion is used to protect the defendant’s rights by ensuring any evidence that was gathered illegally or without a warrant is not used against the defendant in trial. Both motions are used to help the lawyers get a favorable outcome for their clients in Mississippi business litigation law. However, the main difference is that a motion in limine is used to keep evidence or topics from being used in the trial, while a motion to suppress evidence is used to make sure illegally-obtained evidence cannot be used.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between a motion in limine and a motion to suppress evidence in business litigation?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts