What is the standard of proof needed to win a brain injury case?

In order to win a brain injury case in New Hampshire, the legal standard of proof known as “preponderance of the evidence” must be met. This means that the plaintiff (the person bringing the lawsuit) must prove that it is more likely than not that their injury was caused as a result of another party’s negligence. This standard of proof is less stringent than “beyond a reasonable doubt” which is the highest standard of proof used in criminal law. In a brain injury case, the plaintiff must present evidence to support their claim. This evidence can come in the form of witness testimony, medical records, photographs, or other related evidence. The plaintiff must also provide evidence that their injury was directly caused by the defendant’s actions or negligence. For instance, if the defendant drove erratically and the plaintiff was injured in a car accident as a result, the plaintiff must present evidence to demonstrate this. In order to prove that the injury was caused by the defendant’s negligence, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant’s negligence was the reason for the injury. The plaintiff also must be able to prove that the injury was of a certain severity. Finally, the plaintiff must be able to show that the injury has had a significant impact on their life. In summary, brain injury cases require the plaintiff to prove that the injury was caused by the defendant’s negligence, was of a certain severity, and had a meaningful impact on the plaintiff’s life. To do this, the plaintiff must meet the standard of proof known as “preponderance of the evidence.” This is less stringent than “beyond a reasonable doubt”, but still requires a significant amount of evidence and proof to demonstrate the plaintiff’s case.

What is the standard of proof needed to win a brain injury case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts