What is the standard of proof needed to win a brain injury case?

In Texas, the standard of proof needed to win a brain injury case is “preponderance of the evidence”. This is the most common standard of proof used in civil cases and requires that the plaintiff (the person making the claim) must show that it is more likely than not that the defendant (the party being accused) is liable or responsible. It is important to remember that the standard of proof needed for a civil case is different than that of a criminal case. In a criminal case, the prosecution has to prove that the defendant is guilty “beyond a reasonable doubt”. This is a higher standard of proof than a civil case and it is much more difficult to win. In a civil case involving a brain injury, proving that the defendant is liable for the injury requires evidence that they were responsible for causing the injury or contributing to it in some way. Evidence may include testimony from medical professionals, eyewitness accounts, and physical evidence. The plaintiff also needs to be able to prove that they suffered damages due to the injury. This could include medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, and emotional distress. If the plaintiff can show that the liability of the defendant is more likely than not, then it is likely that the case can be won.

Related FAQs

What are the legal implications of a brain injury?
What are the steps involved in filing a brain injury lawsuit?
What is a traumatic brain injury (TBI)?
What types of treatment are available for brain injuries?
What is the difference between a brain injury lawyer and a personal injury lawyer?
What should I expect during a deposition in a brain injury case?
How do insurance companies handle brain injury claims?
How is the extent of brain damage determined?
Are there any support groups for people with brain injuries?
What if a pre-existing condition is aggravated by a brain injury?

What is the standard of proof needed to win a brain injury case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts