What are the legal defenses to a brain injury lawsuit?

In North Carolina, the legal defenses to a brain injury lawsuit typically include assumption of risk, contributory negligence, and assumption of the risk of injury. Assumption of risk is a defense that argues that the injured person was aware of the danger they were in and accepted the risk. This means that if the injured person was aware of the hazard and elected to act anyway, it is assumed that they assumed the risk of injury. Contributory negligence is a defense that argues that the injured person was partially at fault for the injury. If the injured person did something to contribute to the injury, such as ignoring various safety warnings or engaging in risky activities, then this defense may apply. Assumption of the risk of injury is a defense that argues that the injured person assumed the risk of being injured due to their own acts or omissions and was partially responsible for the injury. This means that if the injured person was aware of the risks and disregarded them, the defense may apply. All of these defenses can be used to reduce or eliminate the amount of damages the injured person will receive. It is important to note, however, that the defenses must be argued by an attorney in court in order to be successful.

Related FAQs

How do I choose the best brain injury lawyer?
What is a traumatic brain injury (TBI)?
How long does a brain injury lawsuit take?
What are the long-term effects of a traumatic brain injury (TBI)?
How do insurance companies handle brain injury claims?
Are there any available treatments for a mild traumatic brain injury?
What is the difference between a plaintiff and a defendant in a brain injury lawsuit?
Are family members able to file a brain injury lawsuit on behalf of an injured person?
What is a “loss of companionship” claim?
What types of medical costs can be covered in a brain injury case?

What are the legal defenses to a brain injury lawsuit?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts