What is the difference between a jury award and an out-of-court settlement in a brain injury case?

In a brain injury case, the difference between a jury award and an out-of-court settlement largely depends on the circumstances of the case and the individuals involved. A jury award is a legal judgment that is handed down by a jury following a trial. The jury considers the evidence presented and makes a decision as to who should be held accountable for the injury and how much money in damages should be paid out. The jury award is then presented for the court’s approval. An out-of-court settlement is an agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant in which both parties agree to a certain amount of money to settle the case. Out-of-court settlements are often used to avoid the cost and time associated with a full trial. In a brain injury case, the settlement amount is typically based on a thorough examination of the facts and evidence related to the case. The ultimate decision as to whether a settlement is a suitable option is made by both parties. In conclusion, a jury award is a legal judgment given after a trial and an out-of-court settlement is an agreement between the parties that avoids the cost and time of a trial. It is important to understand the difference between the two when dealing with a brain injury case in Kansas.

Related FAQs

How do insurance companies handle brain injury claims?
What if the injured party had a pre-existing brain injury?
How do I choose the best brain injury lawyer?
What types of damages can be awarded in a brain injury case?
What is a “loss of earning capacity” claim?
How is the value of a brain injury claim determined?
What is the purpose of a brain injury lawyer?
What is a defense to a brain injury lawsuit?
What are the requirements for filing a brain injury claim?
What are the long-term effects of a mild traumatic brain injury?

What is the difference between a jury award and an out-of-court settlement in a brain injury case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts