What is comparative negligence?

Comparative negligence is a legal concept used in North Carolina car accident law. It shares responsibility between parties involved in a car accident. Under a comparative negligence system, the amount of money each party is liable for is determined based on the percentage of fault of each party. For example, if one driver was speeding and the other driver was texting while driving and the two collided, a court might determine the driver who was speeding is 60% responsible for the collision, and the driver who was texting is 40% responsible. Under comparative negligence, the driver who was texting would be responsible for 40% of the damages, and the driver who was speeding would be responsible for 60%. Comparative negligence is an important concept in North Carolina car accident law because it allows parties involved in a car accident to be held accountable for their own actions. It also allows courts to assess damages in a fair and just manner, without one party being held liable for the entire cost of the damages.

Related FAQs

What kind of evidence can I use in court for a car accident case?
What should I do if the driver who hit me doesn’t have insurance?
Can I get a settlement even if I was partially at fault?
What if the other driver is uninsured and I was injured in the accident?
What should I do if the other driver’s insurance company is not responding to my car accident claim?
What if the other driver does not have enough money to pay for my damages?
What kind of compensation can I recover in a car accident case?
Who is responsible for damage to my car if I was hit by an uninsured driver?
How can I find out how much my car accident case is worth?
What is the statute of limitations for filing a wrongful death claim in a car accident case?

What is comparative negligence?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts