Are there any defenses available to a defendant in a catastrophic injury case?

Yes, there are several potential defenses available to a defendant in a catastrophic injury case in California. If the defendant can prove that they were not negligent and did not cause the injury, they would not be legally liable for any damages. Negligence is a key element in catastrophic injury cases, and if the defendant can show that their actions did not amount to negligence, they may be able to avoid liability altogether. In addition, a defendant may also raise the defense of comparative negligence. This defense means that the plaintiff may have been partially at fault for the injury. If the court finds that the plaintiff was partially responsible, their financial award is typically reduced by a corresponding amount. The defense of assumption of risk may also be available to the defendant. This defense holds that the plaintiff “assumed” the risk of injury by voluntarily engaging in the activity that resulted in the injury. The defendant must be able to prove that they warned the plaintiff of the risks associated with the activity for this defense to be successful. Finally, the defense of statutory immunity may also be available. This defense means that the defendant was exempt from liability because their actions were authorized by a state or federal statute. This defense is rarely successful, as courts typically find that the legislature cannot waive a defendant’s responsibility to act in a reasonable manner. In summary, if a defendant can prove that they were not negligent or that the plaintiff was partially responsible for the injury, or if they are able to successfully argue the defenses of assumption of risk or statutory immunity, they may be able to avoid liability for a catastrophic injury.

Are there any defenses available to a defendant in a catastrophic injury case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts