Are there any defenses available to a defendant in a catastrophic injury case?

In a catastrophic injury case in New Hampshire, there are several defenses available to the defendant. It is important for the defendant to be aware of the applicable state laws and understand what their rights are in this situation. One of the most common defenses to a catastrophic injury case is that of contributory negligence. In this defense, the defendant may argue that the plaintiff was partially or completely to blame for their own injuries. The defendant may present evidence that the plaintiff was not following proper safety protocol or that the plaintiff was aware of the risks and chose to disregard them. Another defense is that of assumption of risk. In this defense, the defendant may argue that the plaintiff voluntarily assumed the risk of injury or death by engaging in whatever activity was causing the injury. For example, if the plaintiff was injured by a flying object while playing a sport, the defendant could argue that the plaintiff assumed the risk of injury when they chose to play the game. Finally, in some cases, a defendant may successfully argue that the plaintiff assumed that there was no risk of injury and, as a result, they did not take adequate steps to protect themselves. This is known as the doctrine of assumption of the risk. Overall, the defendant in a catastrophic injury case in New Hampshire may have several possible defenses available to them. It is important for them to be aware of all applicable laws and understand the rights they have in this situation. This will help ensure that they are able to defend their case and achieve the best possible outcome.

Related FAQs

Are there any defenses available to a defendant in a catastrophic injury case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts