What is the standard of proof for punitive damages in civil litigation?

In Alaska, the standard of proof for punitive damages in civil litigation is clear and convincing evidence. This is a higher standard than the preponderance of evidence standard used for most other civil cases, meaning that when deciding whether to award punitive damages, the court must be firmly convinced that the facts are true and that the individual who caused harm was guilty of malicious or oppressive conduct. Clear and convincing evidence is a higher standard for proof that requires more than a simple “more likely than not” determination. It means that those presenting the evidence must show that the facts of the case are highly probable, making it more difficult to prove that punitive damages are warranted. Because punitive damages are intended to punish a defendant and serve as a deterrent to others, the court wants to be sure that the wrongdoer is actually guilty of malicious or oppressive conduct. In Alaska, punitive damages are intended to punish a guilty party for egregious conduct or to deter similar outrageous behavior in the future. Thus, the court must be certain that the individual has acted with malice or oppression before awarding punitive damages. The requirement of clear and convincing evidence helps to ensure that any punitive damages awarded are justified and appropriate.

Related FAQs

What is the standard of proof for punitive damages in civil litigation?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts