What is the doctrine of forum non conveniens in civil litigation?

The doctrine of forum non conveniens is a legal principle in civil litigation that allows a court to decide not to hear certain cases. This principle is often invoked in cases that involve two different countries or states. In New York, the doctrine of forum non conveniens requires that the court be convinced that a different court is more properly suited to handle the dispute. Courts look at a variety of factors when deciding whether or not to apply forum non conveniens. These factors include the location of witnesses, evidence, and the location of the parties involved. Courts also look at the law or laws of each jurisdiction and whether those laws are applicable to the dispute. For example, if the dispute involves a tort, then the court must consider whether the tort laws of the different jurisdictions are applicable and whether one jurisdiction is better suited to try the case. When a court applies forum non conveniens, the parties must bring their dispute to the court where the dispute would most appropriately be heard. The court where the dispute would be heard is known as the forum of convenience. The court must still make a determination as to whether or not the case should be heard by that court. If the court finds that it is not the best court to hear the case, then it will not hear it.

Related FAQs

What is a demurrer in civil litigation?
What is a motion to compel discovery in civil litigation?
What is an anti-suit injunction in civil litigation?
What is a declaratory judgment in civil litigation?
What is the doctrine of judicial estoppel in civil litigation?
What are the civil litigation requirements for service of process?
What are the rules for experts in civil litigation?
What is the role of experts in civil litigation?
What is an amended pleading in civil litigation?
What is a motion for sanctions in civil litigation?

What is the doctrine of forum non conveniens in civil litigation?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts