What is the difference between a negligence and a strict liability claim in a construction accident case?

The difference between a negligence and a strict liability claim in a construction accident case is important to understand when filing a lawsuit in Arkansas. Negligence is a type of claim that is based on someone’s failure to exercise reasonable care. This type of claim is established by proving that an individual or company acted negligently, and that their negligence caused an accident that resulted in someone’s injury or death. Reasonable care is usually defined as the standard of care that would be taken by a reasonable person in similar circumstances. Strict liability, on the other hand, is a legal doctrine that holds a defendant responsible for any harm that is caused by their product or activity, even if they were exercising reasonable care. This type of claim does not require someone to prove that someone acted negligently or that the defendant’s negligence caused the accident. It simply requires them to prove that the product or activity was the cause of the accident and resulted in injuries. The differences between these two claims are important to understand when filing a lawsuit in Arkansas. Negligence requires someone to prove that the defendant acted negligently, while strict liability does not. This means that an individual or company can still be held liable for an accident without having to show that they acted negligently.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between a negligence and a strict liability claim in a construction accident case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts