What is the difference between a contested divorce and a collaborative divorce?

Contested divorces and collaborative divorces both involve couples who are filing for divorce. However, the processes and outcomes are quite different. Contested divorces are when a couple cannot agree on certain terms, such as asset division or spousal support. In these cases, the couple is unable to settle the matter out of court and the case will go to trial. The couple will present their cases to a judge, who will make a binding decision on the terms of the divorce. In a collaborative divorce, the couple is willing to negotiate and come to an agreement without involving a court. In most cases, the couple will hire lawyers, mediators, and other professionals to help guide them through the process. The couple is able to control the outcome of the divorce by agreeing on the terms that are important to them. Overall, the main difference between contested and collaborative divorce is the way in which a couple is able to reach an agreement. In contested divorce, the decision is left to a judge, while in a collaborative divorce the couple is able to make decisions that work for both parties. In North Dakota, couples have the option of filing for a collaborative divorce, which is designed to help couples resolve their matters privately and amicably.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between a contested divorce and a collaborative divorce?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts