What is the difference between a collaborative divorce and a mediated divorce?

The primary difference between a collaborative divorce and a mediated divorce is the process involved in reaching a settlement agreement. In a mediated divorce, the two parties come together and work with a neutral third-party mediator to come to an agreement on the issues of their divorce, such as child custody, visitation, division of assets, and spousal support. The mediator helps the parties come to an agreement by acting as a neutral listener, providing advice, and helping to facilitate a healthy exchange of ideas. A collaborative divorce is a much more involved process, which involves both parties and their attorneys working together to reach an agreement. The attorneys work together to negotiate the most favorable outcome for both parties, while the clients and their attorneys work together to come to a mutually beneficial settlement. This approach often involves additional professionals, such as financial advisors or child custody evaluators, to provide crucial information and perspectives. A collaborative divorce is often most successful when both parties are motivated to reach a fair agreement and are willing to be flexible. In either case, the goal is to reach an agreement that both parties are happy with, without having to go to court. While mediated divorce is often quicker and less expensive than litigation, a collaborative divorce can provide more tailored results that benefit both parties in the long run.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between a collaborative divorce and a mediated divorce?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts