What are the limits to collaborative divorce negotiations?

Collaborative divorce is an alternative to litigation that is gaining popularity in California. It is a process wherein the spouses and their attorneys work together to come to an agreement regarding property division, spousal support, custody and other family matters. This process emphasizes cooperation and communication in order to reach an amicable resolution without engaging in litigation. However, there are limits to the collaborative divorce negotiation process. These limits include any form of physical or verbal abuse in the discussions. In addition, parties should avoid concealing assets or attempting to intentionally mislead the other party. Furthermore, while attorneys involved in collaborative divorce must adhere to the ethical rules of their profession, they cannot provide legal advice to either party and are specifically prohibited from taking any action that would compromise the other party’s interests. In California, if one of the parties decides to withdraw from the collaborative process, the collaborative divorce attorneys must terminate their representation of both parties and neither attorney can represent either party in court proceedings. Additionally, the participants cannot rely on any agreements reached between them during the collaborative divorce process to be binding in court. Lastly, collaborative divorce negotiations may not cover any items that are not related to the dissolution of the marriage. Overall, while collaborative divorce negotiations are a viable option for divorcing couples who wish to reach an agreement without engaging in litigation, it is important that parties respect the limits of the process in order to ensure a successful outcome.

Related FAQs

What are the limits to collaborative divorce negotiations?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts