What is the difference between a collaborative divorce and a traditional divorce?

A collaborative divorce and a traditional divorce are two different types of divorce proceedings. The main difference between the two is that a collaborative divorce does not involve court hearings or litigation to resolve disputes. Instead, the divorcing couple and their attorneys work together to come to an agreement that is beneficial to both parties. This type of divorce typically takes a shorter amount of time and results in lower legal fees since the parties are working together. In Alaska, couples engaging in a collaborative divorce must enter into a written agreement that they will not take the dispute to court. They must also agree to full disclosure of financial information, and to cooperate in the resolution of any outstanding issues. The couple can also agree to utilize outside experts such as mediators to help process the divorce in a timely and effective manner. In contrast, a traditional divorce relies on the court system to resolve disputes between the parties. This type of divorce typically takes longer and is more expensive because of the court hearings and other legal activities involved. Additionally, the parties do not have the same control over the outcome of the case as they would in a collaborative divorce. Overall, a collaborative divorce is a simpler and more cost-effective way of ending a marriage, as it allows the parties to come to an agreement without court intervention. This is especially true in Alaska, where collaborative divorce is available and encouraged.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between a collaborative divorce and a traditional divorce?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts