What is the difference between a collaborative divorce and a traditional divorce?

A collaborative divorce and a traditional divorce have different processes in California. Traditional divorce involves filing a petition with the court and serving it to the other party. Both parties then submit a list of their assets, debts, and income to the court. The court then evaluates the situation and decides on a fair division of the marital assets. Additionally, traditional divorce requires both parties to appear in court and testify. In a collaborative divorce, the parties come to an agreement without resorting to litigation in court. Instead, the parties enter into an agreement to use a team of professionals such as financial advisors and attorneys to help them create a satisfactory agreement. There is no need for the parties to go to court, as the agreement is made outside of the court system. The main difference between a traditional divorce and a collaborative divorce is that in the former, the court makes the decisions for the parties, while in the latter the parties make their own decisions about their assets, debts, and income. Additionally, the process in a collaborative divorce is usually much faster and less expensive than a traditional divorce.

Related FAQs

What is the role of a mental health professional in a collaborative divorce?
How do I make sure that the collaborative divorce is handled fairly?
How do I ensure fair child support arrangements in a collaborative divorce?
How do I ensure that all of our assets are divided equitably in a collaborative divorce?
Is a collaborative divorce binding?
What is a marital settlement agreement?
How do I choose a collaborative divorce attorney?
How do I handle issues of spousal support in a collaborative divorce?
What are the tax implications of a collaborative divorce?
What types of agreements can be negotiated in a collaborative divorce?

What is the difference between a collaborative divorce and a traditional divorce?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts