What is the difference between a collaborative divorce and a traditional divorce?

The primary difference between a collaborative divorce and a traditional divorce is the emphasis on cooperation instead of competition between the two divorcing parties. In a traditional divorce, parties are encouraged to do whatever they can to get the most favorable outcome for themselves, which can lead to a drawn out and expensive trial process. In a collaborative divorce, however, both parties strive to reach an amicable agreement through open communication and respectful negotiation. This means that both parties work together to achieve a fair and mutually beneficial outcome. Another difference is that in a traditional divorce, both sides usually hire their own attorneys who represent their own interests in court. In a collaborative divorce, however, both parties work with their own attorneys throughout the process in order to come up with solutions that are agreeable to both parties. This process often involves the use of experts and other specialists in order to come to the most equitable settlement. In Mississippi, the collaborative divorce process is the only way to obtain a divorce. This means that divorcing couples in the state are not able to go to court and argue their case to a judge. Instead, they must work together to come up with an agreement that is in the best interest of both parties. This approach often leads to a divorce that is amicable and cost-effective, since the parties are able to avoid a lengthy court battle.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between a collaborative divorce and a traditional divorce?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts