What is the difference between a collaborative divorce and a traditional divorce?

In North Carolina, a collaborative divorce is different from a traditional divorce in that it is a process of dispute resolution that allows both parties to reach an agreement outside of a courtroom. During a collaborative divorce, both spouses work together with a team of professionals to reach a mutually beneficial resolution. Both parties must sign a formal agreement stating that they will not go to court to settle the divorce issues, which allows them to negotiate in good faith and commit to resolving the divorce through peaceful negotiations. With a traditional divorce, the two parties are in a more adversarial situation. They are represented by their own lawyers who look out for their clients’ best interests, and the spouses may take their issues to court if they are unable to reach a resolution. This type of divorce is often costly and time-consuming, as the legal process can be lengthy and have unpredictable outcomes. A collaborative divorce provides a more efficient and cost-effective way to reach a settlement that works for both parties, without the need for court proceedings. Attorneys are still involved in the process, but they serve more as mediators than as representatives for each spouse. The goal of the collaborative divorce is to provide an amicable and non-adversarial process for both spouses to reach a fair and balanced settlement that is agreeable to both parties. This type of divorce is often faster and less expensive than traditional divorce proceedings.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between a collaborative divorce and a traditional divorce?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts