What is the difference between a collaborative divorce and a traditional divorce?

A collaborative divorce is an alternative way to divorce that requires both parties to work together to settle their differences and create a healthy, amicable relationship. This type of divorce allows parties to settle their issues outside of court with the help of a collaborative team that is comprised of attorneys, financial advisors, and other professionals. In contrast, a traditional divorce is one in which the two parties are represented by separate attorneys and proceed through the adversarial process of litigation. Through litigation, a judge or jury decides the matters in dispute. In Texas, both a collaborative divorce and a traditional divorce require a filing fee. But the collaborative divorce process can also require additional fees related to the collaborative team, which can lead to a more expensive option. The collaborative divorce process helps to ensure that both parties have a voice in the process while making decisions. In a traditional divorce, however, the judge or jury usually makes all the decisions. Additionally, the collaborative divorce process allows both parties to work together to create a settlement agreement that takes into account each party’s individual needs and interests, while a traditional divorce typically results in one party being awarded more assets than another. Overall, the main difference between a collaborative divorce and a traditional divorce is the process. A collaborative divorce requires both parties to work together to come to a mutual agreement, while a traditional divorce can often lead to litigation and one party receiving more assets than the other.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between a collaborative divorce and a traditional divorce?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts