What is the difference between a collaborative divorce and a traditional divorce?

Collaborative divorce law in Washington is an alternative to traditional divorce proceedings. The main difference between a collaborative divorce and a traditional divorce is that the two parties in a collaborative divorce attempt to resolve their differences out of court. A traditional divorce is handled through the court system and is often adversarial, with each side fighting for the best possible outcome. In a collaborative divorce, married couples work together to resolve issues related to their divorce, such as division of assets, spousal support, and parental responsibilities. Couples are encouraged to work with attorneys who have been trained in collaborative divorce law. The process is voluntary and non-adversarial. All parties involved in a collaborative divorce must agree to follow the terms laid out in the collaborative divorce agreement. The collaborative process can be beneficial for couples who are willing to make an effort to resolve their differences without the sometimes lengthy and expensive process of a traditional divorce. With the help of collaborative divorce lawyers, couples can come to an amicable agreement without the intervention of the court. Couples who choose to complete a collaborative divorce are typically able to do it in a shorter period of time and at a lower cost than a traditional divorce.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between a collaborative divorce and a traditional divorce?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts