What is the difference between a breach of contract and a tort?

A breach of contract and a tort are both legal concepts that involve harm to another person or their property. However, they are not the same thing. A breach of contract occurs when one party fails to fulfill the terms of a legally enforceable agreement. For example, if one party agrees to pay the other party for goods or services but fails to do so, that would be a breach of contract. This can be remedied by paying the other person what was due, or possibly by being sued for damages. A tort, on the other hand, is a civil wrong that does not involve a breach of contract. It may involve negligence or intent to harm another person or their property. In New Jersey, a person can be liable for both economic and non-economic damages, such as pain and suffering, and medical expenses. In the end, the main difference between a breach of contract and a tort is that a breach of contract is a failure to meet the terms of an agreement, while a tort is a civil wrong that does not involve a contract.

Related FAQs

What are the key elements of a commercial contract?
How do I register a trademark?
How is employment contract law enforced?
What is the role of the court in enforcing commercial contracts?
What is corporate governance and how does it work?
What are the rules governing competition in the marketplace?
How does the law protect the rights of consumers?
What is the role of the Competition and Markets Authority?
How can a business protect its assets?
What is the law on insider trading?

What is the difference between a breach of contract and a tort?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts