What is the difference between direct and circumstantial evidence?

In South Carolina criminal procedure, the terms “direct evidence” and “circumstantial evidence” refer to two types of evidence that are used to prove a case. Direct evidence is evidence that proves a fact without requiring any inferences. In other words, it proves the fact directly, without having to draw any conclusions from other evidence. For example, a witness’ testimony or a video recording may be considered direct evidence. Circumstantial evidence is evidence that requires inferences in order to prove a fact. This type of evidence usually consists of facts and circumstances that, when taken together, point to the truth of the matter at hand. It is usually less reliable than direct evidence, but it can be used to bolster a case when direct evidence is lacking. For example, an expert witness’ testimony or physical evidence may be considered circumstantial evidence. In summary, direct evidence is evidence that proves a fact without requiring inferences, whereas circumstantial evidence is evidence that requires inferences in order to prove a fact.

Related FAQs

What is the purpose of a preliminary hearing?
What is the purpose of an arraignment?
What are the rules of bail in criminal cases?
What are the rules of double jeopardy in criminal procedure?
What are the elements of a crime?
What is the role of the jury in criminal cases?
What are the different types of criminal defenses?
What is the process of a criminal trial?
What is the difference between felony and misdemeanor sentencing?
What is the difference between a direct and an indirect concurrent sentence?

What is the difference between direct and circumstantial evidence?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts