What is the difference between a direct and an indirect concurrent sentence?

In Arizona, direct and indirect concurrent sentences both involve the simultaneous serving of two or more sentences imposed by a court. The difference between the two is in how the sentences are imposed. A direct concurrent sentence occurs when a judge orders that two or more sentences be served at the same time. For example, a judge may impose a sentence of 10 years for one crime and 5 years for another, and order that both sentences be served simultaneously. This means that the defendant will actually be in custody for 10 years. An indirect concurrent sentence, on the other hand, occurs when a judge imposes one sentence after another. For example, if a judge orders that the defendant serve 10 years for one crime, followed by 5 years for another, the second sentence will be served consecutively after the first sentence is complete. In this scenario, the defendant will actually be in custody for 15 years. In conclusion, the difference between a direct and an indirect concurrent sentence is that in a direct concurrent sentence, two or more sentences are served at the same time, while in an indirect concurrent sentence, the sentences are served consecutively.

Related FAQs

What is the role of the prosecutor in criminal cases?
What is the exclusionary rule of the Fourth Amendment?
What is the purpose of a criminal complaint?
What are the rules of sentencing in criminal cases?
What is the difference between a felony and a misdemeanor?
What is the difference between a bench trial and a jury trial?
What are the rules for hearsay evidence in criminal cases?
What are the rules of the Fourth Amendment in criminal cases?
What is the difference between a summary offense and an indictable offense?
What is criminal procedure?

What is the difference between a direct and an indirect concurrent sentence?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts