What is the difference between a direct and an indirect concurrent sentence?

In Kansas, a direct concurrent sentence is when a defendant is convicted of two crimes at the same time, and those crimes are served in concurrent terms. This means that a person sentenced to concurrent terms serves both of the sentences together in the same jail or prison term. On the other hand, an indirect concurrent sentence is when a defendant is convicted of multiple crimes, and those crimes are served in consecutive terms. This means that a person who receives an indirect concurrent sentence serves the sentences one after the other. For example, if a person is convicted of two crimes, the first crime with a two-year sentence and the second crime with a one-year sentence, a direct concurrent sentence would mean that the two-year sentence and the one-year sentence would run concurrently and the person would serve two years in jail. An indirect concurrent sentence would mean that the person would serve three years in jail, with the two-year sentence and the one-year sentence running consecutively. The key difference between the two types of concurrent sentences is that a direct concurrent sentence entails the simultaneous service of both sentences, whereas an indirect concurrent sentence entails the successive service of both sentences.

Related FAQs

What are the rules of double jeopardy in criminal procedure?
What are the different stages of criminal procedure?
What are the rules on evidence-gathering in criminal cases?
What is the difference between criminal and civil procedure?
What is probable cause in criminal procedure?
What is the role of the jury in criminal cases?
What is the purpose of criminal discovery?
What is the difference between a direct and an indirect appeal?
What are the rights of victims in criminal cases?
What is the difference between mandatory and discretionary sentencing?

What is the difference between a direct and an indirect concurrent sentence?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts