How can an attorney challenge evidence in a criminal defense case?

An attorney can challenge evidence in a criminal defense case in a few different ways. One way is to argue that the evidence was not obtained legally. For example, an attorney may argue that the police did not obtain a proper warrant or took evidence from an individual’s home without permission. Another way to challenge evidence is to raise questions about its credibility. An attorney may argue that the evidence was compromised in some way or that it was faked or tampered with. In Hawaii, under the Hawaii Rules of Evidence, an attorney may also challenge evidence on other grounds such as whether or not it is relevant to the case or whether it is overly prejudicial. An attorney may also challenge the authenticity or accuracy of the evidence, as well as the qualifications of the witness who supplied the evidence. Finally, an attorney can argue that the evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime. By challenging the evidence in these ways, an attorney can raise questions in the minds of the jury and weaken the prosecution’s case.

Related FAQs

What are some strategies for preparing for a criminal defense case?
What is the criminal justice system in the United States?
How can an attorney present a defense strategy in a criminal trial?
What is the sentencing process in criminal defense law?
What is the right to remain silent in criminal defense law?
What kind of experience should I look for in a criminal defense lawyer?
How are search and seizure issues addressed in criminal defense law?
What is the right to remain silent in criminal defense law?
How is the outcome of a criminal case determined?
How can an attorney challenge evidence in a criminal defense case?

How can an attorney challenge evidence in a criminal defense case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts