How can an attorney challenge evidence in a criminal defense case?

In Maryland, an attorney can challenge evidence in a criminal defense case in several ways. First, they can look at the evidence itself and challenge it on the grounds that it provides insufficient proof of the defendant’s guilt. Second, if the evidence was illegally obtained, the attorney can file a motion to suppress the evidence, which would mean that the evidence would be excluded from the prosecution’s case. Third, an attorney can also challenge the way the evidence was collected or presented, such as the procedures used by police officers or the accuracy of the evidence. Finally, the attorney can also challenge the credibility of any witnesses that may be involved in the case, such as eyewitness testimony. This means that they can bring evidence to show that any witnesses may be unreliable. Overall, by challenging the evidence in a criminal defense case, an attorney can help their client by seeking to have any flawed evidence excluded, or by showing that any witnesses may be unreliable. This can help the attorney build a strong defense for their client and better ensure a fair result in the case.

Related FAQs

How can a criminal defense lawyer help negotiate a plea bargain?
What is the difference between a criminal defense lawyer and a private investigator?
How is evidence presented in a criminal trial?
What are the rights of a criminal suspect in criminal defense law?
What is the difference between a grand jury and a trial jury in criminal defense law?
What is the role of a judge in a criminal defense case?
What is the difference between a felony and a misdemeanor in criminal defense law?
How can I find a criminal defense lawyer?
What is the purpose of a defense attorney in a criminal case?
What types of motions are used in criminal defense cases?

How can an attorney challenge evidence in a criminal defense case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts