What is the difference between a trial and a plea bargain in criminal defense law?

The difference between a trial and a plea bargain in criminal defense law is an important concept to understand. A trial is a legal process where a person accused of a crime is put on trial in a court of law. The accused will usually be represented by an attorney and will present evidence in their defense. The jury or judge will decide if the accused person is guilty or not guilty. A plea bargain is an agreement between a defendant and a prosecutor. The defendant pleads guilty to a lesser charge in exchange for the prosecutor dropping more serious charges. The plea bargain is negotiated and with the approval of the court, the defendant agrees to plead guilty in exchange for a reduced sentence. In a trial, the prosecution will present evidence and the jury or judge will decide whether the accused is guilty or innocent. In a plea bargain, the defendant has already agreed to plead guilty to the lesser charge and the court will decide if the plea bargain is valid. Overall, trials and plea bargains in criminal defense law are two different processes. Trials are a legal process in which evidence is presented and a jury or judge determines innocence or guilt. Plea bargains are an agreement between a defendant and a prosecutor where the defendant pleads guilty to a lesser charge in exchange for the dismissal of more serious charges.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between a trial and a plea bargain in criminal defense law?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts