How can an attorney challenge evidence in a criminal defense case?

In Delaware, an attorney can challenge evidence in a criminal defense case in several ways. The attorney may seek to have the evidence excluded from court on the grounds that it was obtained illegally or through other improper means. This tactic is known as a motion to suppress evidence. The defense attorney may also point out weaknesses or inconsistencies in the evidence, or argue that it is not direct proof of the crime or its elements. The defense attorney may ask for an independent review of the evidence, or contact and interview witnesses to poke holes in the prosecution’s case. Finally, the attorney may try to show that the evidence presented is insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime. The attorney may challenge the reliability of any scientific evidence, such as DNA or ballistics tests, that is presented by the prosecution. By using the tactics outlined above, an attorney can challenge the evidence presented in a criminal defense case. This can be a powerful tool in obtaining a favorable outcome in the case for the defendant.

Related FAQs

How can an attorney challenge evidence in a criminal defense case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts