What is the difference between civil fraud and common law fraud?

Civil fraud and common law fraud are two different legal terms. In Pennsylvania, civil fraud relates to intentionally deceiving another person to gain money or property. This typically involves misrepresenting facts, making false statements, or withholding relevant information about a transaction. Common law fraud is different in that it also involves intentional deception, but with the intent of causing harm. This includes activities like stealing money or property, or taking advantage of someone by manipulating them into a transaction or agreement. Civil fraud is typically considered a civil wrong, while common law fraud is a criminal act. This means that civil fraud can be remedied in civil court, such as through damages, while criminal fraud is handled by a criminal court with harsher penalties. Civil fraud is also different in that it does not require a criminal intent or proof of harm. As long as it is proven that a person intentionally misled another, then civil fraud will likely be upheld. Common law fraud, however, requires the criminal intent and proof of harm in order to be established. Overall, the main difference between civil fraud and common law fraud in Pennsylvania is that civil fraud is a civil wrong while common law fraud is a criminal act. Civil fraud does not require a criminal intent or proof of harm, while common law fraud does.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between civil fraud and common law fraud?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts