What is the difference between civil fraud and statutory malfeasance?

Civil fraud and statutory malfeasance are two different types of illegal activities. Civil fraud is a type of fraud that affects the rights of one or more individuals or organizations. This type of fraud typically involves false pretenses, misrepresentations, or intentional omissions of facts in order to gain something of value. When someone commits civil fraud, they are subject to the civil justice system and could possibly be held liable for damages they’ve caused. Statutory malfeasance is a type of illegal activity involving the misuse or abuse of power by a public official or another type of government worker. This type of illegal activity can range from bribery to improper financial dealings, and typically involves a breach of public trust. When a public official commits statutory malfeasance, they are typically subject to criminal prosecution. The primary difference between civil fraud and statutory malfeasance is that civil fraud involves deceiving individuals or organizations in order to gain something of value, while statutory malfeasance involves the misuse or abuse of power by a public official or other employee of the government. Civil fraud is typically handled in a civil court, whereas statutory malfeasance is prosecuted criminally.

Related FAQs

What are some common defenses to civil fraud?
What is the difference between civil fraud and breach of contract?
What is the difference between civil fraud and accounting fraud?
How can I protect myself from civil fraud?
What is the difference between civil fraud and trespass?
What is the difference between civil fraud and deceptive trade practices?
How can I prove a civil fraud claim?
What is the statute of limitations for civil fraud?
What are the defenses to a claim of civil fraud?
What is the difference between civil fraud and libel?

What is the difference between civil fraud and statutory malfeasance?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts